Anyone who has studied art knows that white is an absolute. If you mix something into white then the white no longer exists -- it merely lightens the original color. In much the same way, mixing a little goodness into something that is bad does not make it good -- what is good merely ceases to be, and all that is left is the bad.
History gives us scores of examples of people who have done evil with good intentions. Hitler believed that he was doing what was best for humankind, yet the whiteness of his good intentions did not change the blackness of genocide to white. Maximilien Robespierre, the leader of the French Revolution, wanted to free his fellowman from the tyranny of the aristocrat and the bourgeois, yet all he brought was the horror that is the guillotine. 70% of those killed in the French Revolution were workers and peasants -- the very people Robespierre was to be championing. The communism of Stalin was no better. From 2.5 to 10 million Ukrainians died due to a government induced famine known as the Holodomor. In addition to the famine, Stalin ordered purges within the Soviet Union of any person deemed to be an enemy of the state. In total, estimates of the total number murdered under Stalins reign, range from 10 million to 60 million. These three leaders as well as many others attempted to gloss over their evil by claiming good intentions, but this did not vindicate them -- it merely brought about a lighter shade of black.
Few people would argue with the idea of naming the aforementioned men as "evil" in spite of their good intentions. History books still call them "murderers." However, these men did not come to be so deluded as to the inequality of their actions versus their intentions overnight. Daily gray decisions that were not good nor completely evil slowly brought about their moral disgrace.
Take a care for the "white lie," for it is not white at all -- merely a lighter shade of black.
As opposed to the irrational relativism of today's society, we have the absolute Word of God. With God, something is not white unless it is completely absent of any other color. While our Lord may recognize the existence of the mix of good intentions with evil actions, He does not rationalize or justify it. The perfect example of this can be found in 2 Samuel 6 with David and Uzzah.
David had the best of intentions when he loaded up the ark of the covenant onto a cart to bring it back to Jerusalem. He was joyful to finally be able to return the ark to its rightful place after it had been among the Philistines for many years. However, this did not change the fact that an ox cart was not the prescribed way to move the ark. There is a long list of rules and regulations concerning the ark in Leviticus and Numbers, and the manner set down to move the ark was very specific: it required that it be carried on foot by priests of the tribe of Levi -- no carts allowed.
Because David, against advice that he was sure to have received, decided to move the ark in this way he was open to the displeasure of God. Because the ark was not being carried correctly, someone had to come along to watch the cart and ensure that the ark did not fall. Because it was not being transported in a stable manner it tipped and Uzzah reached out his hand and grabbed it to steady it. Because God is a just God and keeps his word He struck Uzzah dead as He said He would in His warning to "not touch any holy thing, lest they die," in Numbers 4:15 when He gave instruction concerning the moving of all things pertaining to the tabernacle in this chapter.
This Bible example was used precisely because it shows the unwavering character of God ... and because many people are unsettled by it. This comes as no great surprise. It says in 2 Samuel 6:8 that David was first "displeased" with God because his relatavistic mindset felt that God was unfair; however in the next verse it says that David, "feared" (and we know that "fear" means "respect") God. The rest of the chapter goes on to tell how the ark was joyfully returned to Jerusalem ... in the manner directed by God.
This Biblical view of things being either white or black often flies in the face of our egos -- no one wants to be told what to do or if what they are doing is wrong. However, this philosophical position of absolutes provides stability and leads to respect between God and man and between man and his fellow. The absolute idea of right and wrong -- or more appropriately right and not-right -- provides a reliable foundation for our daily lives. A foundation that will not allow for cracks "relative" to the terrain that undermine the total stability of any society built on it.
White, black and gray. Three colours in two categories: what is white and what is not. Do we view our actions in similar categories: what is good and what is not? Or do we try to rationalize? Or judge relative to the circumstances? Do we live with clear and defined classifications? Or is everything kind of "gray"? Remember, gray is just a lighter shade of black.
Some verses on God's view of absolutes:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." Matthew 5:37
"Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." Matthew 7:16-20



